{"id":1247,"date":"2010-01-02T17:47:29","date_gmt":"2010-01-02T16:47:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.devco.net\/?p=1247"},"modified":"2010-01-02T17:47:29","modified_gmt":"2010-01-02T16:47:29","slug":"do_your_backups","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.devco.net\/archives\/2010\/01\/02\/do_your_backups.php","title":{"rendered":"Do your backups!"},"content":{"rendered":"

I have a QNAP TS-209<\/a> Nas device. It’s a Linux based appliance with 2 hot swap drives.<\/p>\n

It has now died by the looks of it, QNAP support has been utterly useless to say the least but I have pretty much resolved to just replacing this unit even if they are able to resurrect it. The problem with the 1xx and 2xx range of QNAP is that its some weird CPU architecture and to enable huge files on them they had to patch the ext3 file system.<\/p>\n

The end result is that while the devices are advertised as being ext3 they are in-fact a patched ext3 and you cannot just mount them in a Linux machine. They have also now stopped selling this series of machine so should yours ever die you are just plainly out of luck. QNAP have made a live cd available that’s similarly patched so you should have some hope if you are really in trouble.<\/p>\n

In my case the device seem to have also totally corrupted the drives when it died so even in the Live CD scenario both are dead. It seems the SATA interface has gone rather than the disks, the moment I put a disk in it seems the CPU is totally kept busy dealing with blocking I\/O requests, out of a 1000 pings about 20 will get replies – and those will be 30 second response times.<\/p>\n

This brings me to several points:<\/p>\n