Archive | Code RSS feed for this section

MCollective and other languages

I often get asked about MCollective and other programming languages. Thus far we only support Ruby but my hope is in time we’ll be able to be more generic.

Initially I had a few requirements from serialization:

  • It must retain data types
  • Encoding the same data – like a hash – twice should give the same result from the point of view of md5()

That was about it really. This was while we used a pre-shared key to validate requests and so the result of the encode and decode should be the same on the sender as on the receiver. With YAML this was never the case so I used Marshal.

We recently had a SSL based security plugin contributed that relaxed the 2nd requirement so we can go back to using YAML. We could in theory relax the 1st requirement but it would just inhibit the kind of tools you can build with MCollective quite a bit. So I’d strongly suggest this is a must have.

Today there are very few cross language serializers that let you just deal with arbitrary data YAML is one that seems to have a log of language support. Prior to version 1.0.0 of MCollective the SSL security system only supported Marshal but we’ll support YAML in addition to Marshal in 1.0.0.

This enabled me to write a Perl client that speaks to your standard Ruby collective (if it runs this new plugin).

You can see the Perl client here. The Perl code is roughly a mc-find-hosts written in Perl and without command line options for filtering – though you can just adjust the filters in the code. It’s been years since I wrote any Perl so that’s just the first thing that worked for me.

Point is someone should be able to take any language that has the Syck YAML bindings and write a client library to talk with Mcollective. I tried the non Syck bindings in PHP and it’s unusable, I suspect the PHP Syck bindings will work better but I didn’t try them.

As mentioned on the user list post 1.0.0 I intend to focus on long running and scheduled requests I’ll then also work on some kind of interface between Mcollective and Agents written in other languages – since that is more or less how long running scheduled tasks would work anyway. This will then use the Ruby as a transport hooking clients and agents in different languages together.

I can see that I’ll enable this but I am very unlikely to write the clients myself. I am therefore keen to speak to community members who want to speak to MCollective from languages like Python and who have some time to work on this.

Read full storyComments { 2 }

Rapid Puppet runs with MCollective

The typical Puppet use case is to run the daemon every 30 minutes or so and just let it manage your machines. Sometimes though you want to be able to run it on all your machines as quick as your puppet master can handle.

This is tricky as you generally do not have a way to cap the concurrency and it’s hard to orchestrate that. I’ve extended the MCollective Puppet Agent to do this for you so you can do a rapid run at roll out time and then go back to the more conservative slow pace once your window is over.

The basic logic I implemented is this:

  1. Discover all nodes, sort them alphabetically
    1. Count how many nodes are active now, wait till it’s below threshold
    2. Run a node by just starting a –onetime background run
    3. Sleep a second

This should churn through your nodes very quickly without overwhelming the resources of your master. You can see it in action here, you can see it started 3 nodes and once it got to the 4th 3 were already running and it waited for one of them to finish:

% mc-puppetd -W /dev_server/ runall 2
Thu Aug 05 17:47:21 +0100 2010> Running all machines with a concurrency of 2
Thu Aug 05 17:47:21 +0100 2010> Discovering hosts to run
Thu Aug 05 17:47:23 +0100 2010> Found 4 hosts
Thu Aug 05 17:47:24 +0100 2010> Running dev1.one.net, concurrency is 0
Thu Aug 05 17:47:26 +0100 2010> dev1.one.net schedule status: OK
Thu Aug 05 17:47:28 +0100 2010> Running dev1.two.net, concurrency is 1
Thu Aug 05 17:47:30 +0100 2010> dev1.two.net schedule status: OK
Thu Aug 05 17:47:32 +0100 2010> Running dev2.two.net, concurrency is 2
Thu Aug 05 17:47:34 +0100 2010> dev2.two.net schedule status: OK
Thu Aug 05 17:47:35 +0100 2010> Currently 3 nodes running, waiting
Thu Aug 05 17:48:00 +0100 2010> Running dev3.two.net, concurrency is 2
Thu Aug 05 17:48:05 +0100 2010> dev3.two.net schedule status: OK

This is integrated into the existing mc-puppetd client script you don’t need to roll out anything new to your servers just the client side.

Using this to run each of 47 machines with a concurrency of just 4 I was able to complete a cycle in 8 minutes. Doesn’t sound too impressive but my average run time is around 40 seconds on every node with some being 90 to 150 seconds. My puppetmaster server that usually sits at a steady 0.2mbit out were serving a constant 2mbit/sec for the duration of this run.

Read full storyComments { 2 }

Monitoring ActiveMQ

I have a number of ActiveMQ servers, 7 in total, 3 in a network of brokers the rest standalone. For MCollective I use topics extensively so don’t really need to monitoring them much other than for availability. I also though do a lot of Queued work where lots of machines put data in a queue and others process the data.

In the Queue scenario you absolutely need to monitor queue sizes, memory usage and such. You also need to graph things like rates of messages, consumer counts and memory use. I am busy writing a number of Nagios and Cacti plugins to help with this, you can find them on Github.

To use these you need to have the ActiveMQ Statistics Plugin enabled.

First we need to monitor queue sizes:

$ check_activemq_queue.rb --host localhost --user nagios --password passw0rd --queue exim.stats --queue-warn 1000 --queue-crit 2000
OK: ActiveMQ exim.stats has 1 messages

This will connect to localhost monitoring a queue exim.stats warning you when it’s got 1000 messages and critical at 2000.

I need to add to this the ability to monitor memory usage, this will come over the next few days.

I also have a plugin for Cacti it can output stats for the broker as a whole and also for a specific queue. First the whole broker:

$ activemq-cacti-plugin.rb --host localhost --user nagios --password passw0rd --report broker
stomp+ssl:stomp+ssl storePercentUsage:81 size:5597 ssl:ssl vm:vm://web3 dataDirectory:/var/log/activemq/activemq-data dispatchCount:169533 brokerName:web3 openwire:tcp://web3:6166 storeUsage:869933776 memoryUsage:1564 tempUsage:0 averageEnqueueTime:1623.90502285799 enqueueCount:174080 minEnqueueTime:0.0 producerCount:0 memoryPercentUsage:0 tempLimit:104857600 messagesCached:0 consumerCount:2 memoryLimit:20971520 storeLimit:1073741824 inflightCount:9 dequeueCount:169525 brokerId:ID:web3-44651-1280002111036-0:0 tempPercentUsage:0 stomp:stomp://web3:6163 maxEnqueueTime:328585.0 expiredCount:0

Now a specific queue:

$ activemq-cacti-plugin.rb --host localhost --user nagios --password passw0rd --report exim.stats
size:0 dispatchCount:168951 memoryUsage:0 averageEnqueueTime:1629.42897052992 enqueueCount:168951 minEnqueueTime:0.0 consumerCount:1 producerCount:0 memoryPercentUsage:0 destinationName:queue://exim.stats messagesCached:0 memoryLimit:20971520 inflightCount:0 dequeueCount:168951 expiredCount:0 maxEnqueueTime:328585.0

Grab the code on GitHub and follow there, I expect a few updates in the next few weeks.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Bootstrapping Puppet on EC2 with MCollective

The problem of getting EC2 images to do what you want is quite significant, mostly I find the whole thing a bit flakey and with too many moving parts.

  • When and what AMI to start
  • Once started how to do you configure it from base to functional. Especially in a way that doesn’t become a vendor lock.
  • How do you manage the massive sprawl of instances, inventory them and track your assets
  • Monitoring and general life cycle management
  • When and how do you shut them, and what cleanup is needed. Being billed by the hour means this has to be a consideration

These are significant problems and just a tip of the ice berg. All of the traditional aspects of infrastructure management – like Asset Management, Monitoring, Procurement – are totally useless in the face of the cloud.

A lot of work is being done in this space by tools like Pool Party, Fog, Opscode and many other players like the countless companies launching control panels, clouds overlaying other clouds and so forth. As a keen believer in Open Source many of these options are not appealing.

I want to focus on the 2nd step above here today and show how I pulled together a number of my Open Source projects to automate that. I built a generic provisioner that hopefully is expandable and usable in your own environments. The provisioner deals with all the interactions between Puppet on nodes, the Puppet Master, the Puppet CA and the administrators.

<rant> Sadly the activity in the Puppet space is a bit lacking in the area of making it really easy to get going on a cloud. There are suggestions on the level of monitoring syslog files from a cronjob and signing certificates based on that. Really. It’s a pretty sad state of affairs when that’s the state of the art.

Compare the ease of using Chef’s Knife with a lot of the suggestions currently out there for using Puppet in EC2 like these: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Not trying to have a general Puppet Bashing session here but I think it’s quite defining of the 2 user bases that Cloud readiness is such an after thought so far in Puppet and its community. </rant>

My basic needs are that instances all start in the same state, I just want 1 base AMI that I massage into the desired final state. Most of this work has to be done by Puppet so it’s repeatable. Driving this process will be done by MCollective.

I bootstrap the EC2 instances using my EC2 Bootstrap Helper and I use that to install MCollective with just a provision agent. It configures it and hook it into my collective.

From there I have the following steps that need to be done:

  • Pick a nearby Puppet Master, perhaps using EC2 Region or country as guides
  • Set up the host – perhaps using /etc/hosts – to talk to the right master
  • Revoke and clean any old certs for this hostname on all masters
  • Instruct the node to create a new CSR and send it to its master
  • Sign the certificate
  • Run my initial bootstrap Puppet environment, this sets up some hard to do things like facts my full build needs
  • Run the final Puppet run in my normal production environment.
  • Notify me using XMPP, Twitter, Google Calendar, Email, Boxcar and whatever else I want of the new node

This is a lot of work to be done on every node. And more importantly it’s a task that involves many other nodes like puppet masters, notifiers and so forth. It has to adapt dynamically to your environment and not need reconfiguring when you get new Puppet Masters. It has to deal with new data centers, regions and countries without needing any configuration or even a restart. It has to happen automatically without any user interaction so that your auto scaling infrastructure can take care of booting new instances even while you sleep.

The provisioning system I wrote does just this. It follows the above logic for any new node and is configurable for which facts to use to pick a master and how to notify you of new systems. It adapts automatically to your ever changing environments thanks to discovery of resources. The actions to perform on the node are easily pluggable by just creating an agent that complies to the published DDL like the sample agent.

You can see it in action in the video below. I am using Amazon’s console to start the instance, you’d absolutely want to automate that for your needs. You can also see it direct on blip.tv here. For best effect – and to be able to read the text – please fullscreen.

In case the text is unreadable in the video a log file similar to the one in the video can be seen here and an example config here

Past this point my Puppet runs are managed by my MCollective Puppet Scheduler.

While this is all done using EC2 nothing prevents you from applying these same techniques to your own data center or non cloud environment.

Hopefully this shows that you can wrap all the logic needed to do very complex interactions with systems that are perhaps not known for their good reusable API’s in simple to understand wrappers with MCollective, exposing those systems to the network at large with APIs that can be used to reach your goals.

The various bits of open source I used here are:

Read full storyComments { 3 }

Puppet resources on demand with MCollective

Some time ago I wrote how to reuse Puppet providers in your Ruby script, I’ll take that a bit further here and show you to create any kind of resource.

Puppet works based on resources and catalogs. A catalog is a collection of resources and it will apply the catalog to a machine. So in order to do something you can do as before and call the type’s methods directly but if you wanted to build up a resource and say ‘just do it’ then you need to go via a catalog.

Here’s some code, I don’t know if this is the best way to do it, I dug around the code for ralsh to figure this out:

params = { :name => "rip",
           :comment => "R.I.Pienaar",
           :password => '......' }
 
pup = Puppet::Type.type(:user).new(params)
 
catalog = Puppet::Resource::Catalog.new
catalog.add_resource pup
catalog.apply

That’s really simple and doesn’t require you to know much about the inner workings of a type, you’re just mapping the normal Puppet manifest to code and applying it. Nifty.

The natural progression – to me anyway – is to put this stuff into a MCollective agent and build a distributed ralsh.

Here’s a sample use case, I wanted to change my users password everywhere:

$ mc-rpc puppetral do type=user name=rip password='$1$xxx'

And that will go out, find all my machines and use the Puppet RAL to change my password for me. You can do anything puppet can, manage /etc/hosts, add users, remove users, packages, services and anything even your own custom types can be used. Distributed and in parallel over any number of hosts.

Some other examples:

Add a user:

$ mc-rpc puppetral do type=user name=foo comment="Foo User" managehome=true

Run a command using exec, with the magical creates option:

$ mc-rpc puppetral do type=exec name="/bin/date > /tmp/date" user=root timeout=5 creates="/tmp/date"

Add an aliases entry:

$ mc-rpc puppetral do type=mailalias name=foo recipient="rip@devco.net" target="/etc/aliases"

Install a package:

$ mc-rpc puppetral do type=package name=unix2dos ensure=present

Read full storyComments { 0 }
Aggregating Nagios Checks With MCollective

Aggregating Nagios Checks With MCollective

A very typical scenario I come across on many sites is the requirement to monitor something like Puppet across 100s or 1000s of machines.

The typical approaches are to add perhaps a central check on your puppet master or to check using NRPE or NSCA on every node. For this example the option exist to easily check on the master and get one check but that isn’t always easily achievable.

Think for example about monitoring mail queues on all your machines to make sure things like root mail isn’t getting stuck. In those cases you are forced to do per node checks which inevitably result in huge notification storms in the event that your mail server was down and not receiving the mail from the many nodes.

MCollective has had a plugin that can run NRPE commands for a long time, I’ve now added a nagios plugin using this agent to combine results from many hosts.

Sticking with the Puppet example, here are my needs:

  • I want to know if anywhere some puppet machine isn’t successfully doing runs.
  • I want to be able to do puppetd –disable and not get alerts for those machines.
  • I do not want to change any configs when I am adding new machines, it should just work.
  • I want the ability to do monitoring on subsets of machines on different probes

This is a pretty painful set of requirements for nagios on its own to achieve. Easy with the help of MCollective.

Ultimately, I just want this:

OK: 42 WARNING: 0 CRITICAL: 0 UNKNOWN: 0

Meaning 42 machines – only ones currently enabled – are all running happily.

The NRPE Check

We put the NRPE logic on every node. A simple check command in /etc/nagios/nrpe.d/check_puppet_run.cfg:

command[check_puppet_run]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_file_age -f /var/lib/puppet/state/state.yaml -w 5400 -c 7200

In my case I just want to know there are successful runs happening, if I wanted to know the code is actually compiling correctly I’d monitor the local cache age and size.

Determining if Puppet is enabled or not

Currently this is a bit hacky, I’ve filed tickets with Puppet Labs to improve this. The way to determine if puppet is disabled is to check if the lock file exist and if its 0 bytes. If it’s not zero bytes it means a puppetd is currently doing a run – there will be a pid in it. Or the puppetd crashed and there’s a stale pid preventing other runs.

To automate this and integrate into MCollective I’ve made a fact puppet_enabled. We’ll use this in MCollective discovery to only monitor machines that are enabled. Get this onto all your nodes perhaps using Plugins in Modules.

The MCollective Agent

You want to deploy the MCollective NRPE Agent to all your nodes, once you’ve got it right you can test it easily using something like this:

% mc-nrpe -W puppet_enabled=1 check_puppet_run
 
 * [ ============================================================> ] 47 / 47
 
Finished processing 47 / 47 hosts in 395.51 ms
              OK: 47
         WARNING: 0
        CRITICAL: 0
         UNKNOWN: 0

Note we’re restricting the run to only enabled hosts.

Integrating into Nagios

The last step is to add this to nagios. I create SSL certs and a specific client configuration for Nagios and put these in it’s home directory.

The check-mc-nrpe plugin works best with Nagios 3 as it will return subsequent lines of output indicating which machines are in what state so you get the details hidden behind the aggregation in alerts. It also outputs performance data for total node, each status and also how long it took to do the check.

The nagios command would be something like this:

define command{
        command_name                    check_mc_nrpe
        command_line                    /usr/sbin/check-mc-nrpe  --config /var/log/nagios/.mcollective/client.cfg  -W $ARG1$ $ARG2$
}

And finally we need to make a service:

define service{
        host_name                       monitor1
        service_description             mc_puppet-run
        use                             generic-service
        check_command                   check_mc_nrpe!puppet_enabled=1!check_puppet_run
        notification_period             awakehours
        contact_groups                  sysadmin
}

Here are a few other command examples I use:

All machines with my Puppet class “pki”, check the age of certs:

check_command   check_mc_nrpe!pki!check_pki

All machines with my Puppet class “bacula::node”, make sure the FD is running:

check_command   check_mc_nrpe!bacula::node!check_fd

…and that they were backed up:

check_command   check_mc_nrpe!bacula::node!check_bacula_main

Using this I removed 100s of checks from my monitoring platform, saving on resources and making sure I can do my critical monitor tasks better.

Depending on the quality of your monitoring system you might even get a graph showing the details hidden behind the aggregation:

The above is a graph showing a series of servers where the backup ran later than usual, I had 2 alerts only, would have had more than 30 before aggregation.

Restrictions for Probes

The last remaining requirement I had was to be able to do checks on different probes and restrict them. My Collective is one big one spread all over the world which means sometimes things are a bit slow discovery wise.

So I have many nagios servers doing local checks. Using MCollective discovery I can now easily restrict checks, for example If I only wanted to check machines in the USA and I had a fact country I only have to change my command line in the service declaration:

check_command   check_mc_nrpe!puppet_enabled=1 country=us!check_puppet_run

This will then via MCollective discovery just monitor machines in the US.

What to monitor this way

As this style of monitoring is done using Discovery you would need to think carefully about what you monitor this way. It’s totally conceivable that if a node is under high CPU load that it wont respond to discovery commands in time, and so wont get monitored!

You would then for example not want to monitor things like load averages or really critical services this way, but we all have a lot of peripheral things like zombie process counts and a lot of other places where aggregation makes a lot of sense, in those cases by all means consider this approach.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Tutorial: Writing MCollective Agents

I’ve recorded a screencast that walks you through the process of developing a SimpleRPC Agent, give it a DDL and also a simple client to communicate with it.

The tutorial creates a small echo agent that takes input and return it unmodified. It validates that you are sending a string and has a sample of dealing with intermittent failure.

Once you’ve watched this, or even during, you can use the following links are reference material: Writing Agents, Data Definition Language and Writing Clients.

You can view it directly on blip.tv which will hopefully be better quality.

I used a few VIM Snippets during the demo to boilerplate the agent and DDL, you’ll find these in the tarball for the upcoming 0.4.7 release in the ext/vim directory, they are already on GitHub too.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Recent MCollective releases and roadmap.

I’ve had two successive Marionette Collective releases recently, I was hoping to have one big one but I was waiting for the Stomp maintainers to do a release and it was taking a while.

These two releases are both major feature releases covering major feature sets. See lower down for a breakdown of it all.

We’re nearing feature completeness for the SimpleRPC layer as I am adding a number of features of interest to Enterprise and Large users especially around security and web UIs.

Once we’re at the end of this cycle I’ll do a 1.0.0 release and then from there move onto the next major feature cycle. The next cycle will focus on queuing long running tasks, background scheduling, future scheduling of tasks and a lot of related work. I posted some detail about these plans to the list recently.

Over the new few days or weeks I’ll do a number of Screencasts exploring some of these new features in depth, for now the list of what’s new:

Security

Connectivity

We can use Ruby Gem Stomp 1.1.6 which brings a lot of enhancements:

  • Connection pools for failover between multiple ActiveMQs
  • Lots of tunables about the connection pools such as retry frequencies etc
  • SSL TLS between node and ActiveMQ

Writing Web and Dynamic UIs

  • A DDL that describes agents, inputs and outputs:
    • Creates auto generated documentation
    • Can be used to auto generate user interfaces
    • The client library will only make requests that validate against the DDL
    • In future input validations will move into the DDL and will be done automatically for you
  • Web UI’s can bypass or do their own discovery and use the DDL to auto generate user interfaces

Usability

  • Fire-and-Forget style requests, for when you just want something done but do not care about results, these requests are very quick as they do not do any discovery.
  • Agents can now be reloaded without restarting the daemon
  • A new mc-inventory tool that can be used to view facts, agents and classes for a node
  • Many UI enhancements to the CLI tools
Read full storyComments { 1 }

Xen Live Migration with MCollective

I retweeted this on twitter, but it’s just too good to not show. Over at rottenbytes.com Nicolas is showing some proof of concept code he wrote with MCollective that monitors the load on his dom0 machines and initiate live migrations of virtual machines to less loaded servers.

This is the kind of crazy functionality I wanted to enable with MCollective and it makes me very glad to see this kind of thing. The server side and client code combined is only 230 lines – very very impressive.

This is a part of what VMWare DRS does Nico has some ideas to add other sexy features as well as this was just a proof of concept. The logic for what to base migrations on will be driven by a small DSL for example.

I asked him how long it took to knock this together: time taken to get acquainted with MCollective combined with time to write the agent and client was only 2 days, that’s very impressive. He already knew Ruby well though :) And has a Ruby gem to integrate with Xen.

I’m copying the output from his code below, but absolutely head over to his blog to check it out he has the source up there too:

[mordor:~] ./mc-xen-balancer
[+] hypervisor2 : 0.0 load and 0 slice(s) running
[+] init/reset load counter for hypervisor2
[+] hypervisor2 has no slices consuming CPU time
[+] hypervisor3 : 1.11 load and 3 slice(s) running
[+] added test1 on hypervisor3 with 0 CPU time (registered 18.4 as a reference)
[+] added test2 on hypervisor3 with 0 CPU time (registered 19.4 as a reference)
[+] added test3 on hypervisor3 with 0 CPU time (registered 18.3 as a reference)
[+] sleeping for 30 seconds
 
[+] hypervisor2 : 0.0 load and 0 slice(s) running
[+] init/reset load counter for hypervisor2
[+] hypervisor2 has no slices consuming CPU time
[+] hypervisor3 : 1.33 load and 3 slice(s) running
[+] updated test1 on hypervisor3 with 0.0 CPU time eaten (registered 18.4 as a reference)
[+] updated test2 on hypervisor3 with 0.0 CPU time eaten (registered 19.4 as a reference)
[+] updated test3 on hypervisor3 with 1.5 CPU time eaten (registered 19.8 as a reference)
[+] sleeping for 30 seconds
 
[+] hypervisor2 : 0.16 load and 0 slice(s) running
[+] init/reset load counter for hypervisor2
[+] hypervisor2 has no slices consuming CPU time
[+] hypervisor3 : 1.33 load and 3 slice(s) running
[+] updated test1 on hypervisor3 with 0.0 CPU time eaten (registered 18.4 as a reference)
[+] updated test2 on hypervisor3 with 0.0 CPU time eaten (registered 19.4 as a reference)
[+] updated test3 on hypervisor3 with 1.7 CPU time eaten (registered 21.5 as a reference)
[+] hypervisor3 has 3 threshold overload
[+] Time to see if we can migrate a VM from hypervisor3
[+] VM key : hypervisor3-test3
[+] Time consumed in a run (interval is 30s) : 1.7
[+] hypervisor2 is a candidate for being a host (step 1 : max VMs)
[+] hypervisor2 is a candidate for being a host (step 2 : max load)
trying to migrate test3 from hypervisor3 to hypervisor2 (10.0.0.2)
Successfully migrated test3 !

Read full storyComments { 1 }

Authorization plugins for MCollective SimpleRPC

Till now The Marionette Collective has relied on your middleware to provide all authorization and authentication for requests. You’re able to restrict certain middleware users from certain agents, but nothing more fine grained.

In many cases you want to provide much finer grain control over who can do what, some cases could be:

  • A certain user can only request service restarts on machines with a fact customer=acme
  • A user can do any service restart but only on machines that has a certain configuration management class
  • You want to deny all users except root from being able to stop services, others can still restart and start them

This kind of thing is required for large infrastructures with lots of admins all working in their own group of machines but perhaps a central NOC need to be able to work on all the machines, you need fine grain control over who can do what and we did not have this will now. It would also be needed if you wanted to give clients control over their own servers but not others.

Version 0.4.5 will have support for this kind of scheme for SimpleRPC agents. We wont provide a authorization plugin out of the box with the core distribution but I’ve made one which will be available as a plugin.

So how would you write an auth plugin, first a typical agent would be:

module MCollective
    module Agent
         class Service<RPC::Agent
             authorized_by :action_policy
 
             # ....
         end
    end
end

The new authorized_by keyword tells MCollective to use the class MCollective::Util::ActionPolicy to do any authorization on this agent.

The ActionPolicy class can be pretty simple, if it raises any kind of exception the action will be denied.

module MCollective
    module Util
         class ActionPolicy
              def self.authorize(request)
                  unless request.caller == "uid=500"
                      raise("You are not allow access to #{request.agent}::#{request.action}")
                  end
              end
         end
    end
end

This simple check will deny all requests from anyone but Unix user id 500.

It’s pretty simple to come up with your own schemes, I wrote one that allows you to make policy files like the one below for the service agent:

policy default deny
allow   uid=500 *                    *                *
allow   uid=502 status               *                *
allow   uid=600 *                    customer=acme    acme::devserver

This will allow user 500 to do everything with the service agent. User 502 can get the status of any service on any node. User 600 will be able to do any actions on machines with the fact customer=acme that also has the configuration management class acme::devserver on them. Everything else will be denied.

You can do multiple facts and multiple classes in a simple space separated list. The entire plugin to implement such policy controls was only 120 – heavy commented – lines of code.

I think this is a elegant and easy to use layer that provides a lot of functionality. We might in future pass more information about the caller to the nodes. There’s some limitations, specifically about the source of the caller information being essentially user provided so you need to keep that mind.

As mentioned this will be in MCollective 0.4.5.

Read full storyComments { 1 }